I am sure you have had chance to see the changes to the GP contract for next year by now, the headline of which is an increased investment into general practice for the first time in what feels like a very long time. But what can we learn from the new contract? Here are 5 initial observations.
- This government wants to invest in general practice
Last year when the Labour government came into power they increased the global sum by 7.4% to fund GP and practice staff pay rises worth 6%, and this has been followed up with a 7.2% cash growth on the total contract funding envelope in this year’s settlement.
This is in stark contrast to the previous administration, who steadfastly refused to release any additional funds beyond those agreed in the 2019 contract, despite inflation running into double figures. Not only that, but overall money is extremely tight, both in the NHS and more widely across government, and so this injection of funding is not in line with what is happening in most other areas.
The government has pledged to shift care from hospitals to the community, and to increase the percentage share of NHS funding that primary care receives, and this settlement indicates that they are looking to make good on these promises. This is good news for general practice, and holds promise for the future.
- Life is not going to improve quickly for practices
The less good news is that all of the new investment is likely to get swallowed up by either new or existing cost pressures. Of the global sum increase of £743M, it is estimated that £300M will be swallowed up by the new employer national insurance contributions and increase in the national living wage, and a further £300M to fund a 2.8% pay uplift for staff. This only leaves £143M to fund any other new cost pressures, and to try and start to make a dent in the backlog of unfunded cost pressures from previous years.
So while at least things will not get worse financially for practices this year (which in itself is a change from previous years), they also are unlikely to get much better.
- Access is the priority for general practice
For all the talk about neighbourhoods in recent times, these changes reinforce the priority that the government gives to improving GP access. The key inclusion into the contract is the requirement for practices to keep their online consultation tools on for the duration of core hours from the 1st October.
The delayed implementation date and the multiple references to “necessary safeguards” indicate this was a tough part of the contract changes to agree, but one that NHS England was not prepared to back down on. Given improvements to GP access is also a key priority for the emerging neighbourhoods for this year we should not expect the pressure in this area to ease any time soon.
- PCNs are not going anywhere
For the GPC’s part, they have clearly worked hard to negotiate more flexibility to the ARRS pot. A number of concessions have been made such as the caps on numbers of staff being removed, the pot for new GPs no longer being separate, the maximum reimbursable salary for GPs being increased, and the addition of practice nurses to the roles that can be employed.
However, what the GPC really wanted was for the £1.6bn of ARRS funding to be shifted into the core contract. This was not agreed by NHS England. There is to be a “joint review on the future of ARRS” through 25/26, but that really just points to an inability to get to an agreement within these contact discussions.
The reality is that while it would have been cost neutral for NHS England to meet this demand, they know that the majority of PCN funding is within the ARRS pot, and that dismantling it would most likely effectively precipitate the demise of PCNs. PCNs clearly form an important component of the neighbourhoods that we will find more out about in the 10 year plan, and having fought so hard and invested so much in their establishment over the last 6 years NHS England is not prepared to simply let them go.
- Much bigger change for general practice is on the way
This contract very much has the feel of a holding contract, one that is designed to keep things going, remove the cloud of collective action and suggest positive intent without introducing any major changes.
However, GPC England has been clear that acceptance of this contract is conditional on a commitment from the government to a “full renegotiation of the new national contract, beginning within this parliament”. The government, meanwhile, is closing in on the publication of its much-touted 10 year plan, and for the shifts it is seeking to achieve changes in general practice are going to be required.
This all points to much bigger changes ahead. At least now the two sides are talking and have been able to come to an agreement for this year, but any trust that has been built is likely to be needed in the even trickier negotiations that await in the years to come.
No Comments