• Home
  • Who We Are
    • Our mission
  • Our Services
  • Blog
    • Blog Index
  • Podcast
    • Podcast Index
  • Resources
    • Book
    • Link of The Week
    • Ockham Links
    • Publications
    • TV documentary
  • Sale
  • Contact Us

No products in the basket.

  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Our mission
  • Our Services
  • Blog
    • Blog Index
  • Podcast
    • Podcast Index
  • Resources
    • Book
    • Link of The Week
    • Ockham Links
    • Publications
    • TV documentary
  • Sale
  • Contact Us

10
feb
0

Could the Vaccination Programme have been Organised Differently?

Posted by Ben GowlandBlogs, The General Practice BlogNo Comments

Last week I considered whether the impact of the vaccination programme might end up being too much for general practice, as a result of the financial and personal challenges that it has entailed.  One of the questions that this provoked was what would I have done differently given the chance to run the national programme?

Of course no one has the freedom to run the national programme.  Even our national primary care leads are constantly negotiating with (and directed by) their own political and NHS masters.  But even with that in mind the national approach could have been different.

The national approach has been characterised, I think it is fair to say, by control.  It started with the insistence that general practice sites were organised via “PCN groupings”.  Why was that?  Well in part it was because of the logistics of the Pfizer vaccine.  But this was never going to be the only vaccine, and the logistics were always likely to change, but there was never a commitment to work through individual practices.  PCN groupings were to be the delivery unit.

The fact is c1000 PCN groupings are easier to control than over 7000 practice units.  Supply can be controlled, delivery can be controlled, cohorts can be controlled.  While the vaccination service has technically been delivered via an enhanced service contract, in reality it has been managed as an NHS directly delivered service.  The daily requirements to provide information, the strict controls on what is and isn’t allowed, and the regular interventions from above into local sites are all testament to that.

This does feel like a taste of the future.  PCNs will increasingly be the ‘go to’ units of general practice, rather than individual practices themselves.  In part this is because it makes ‘integration’ between general practice and the rest of the NHS easier to achieve (e.g. the arrangements for mental health workers in next year’s ARRS scheme), but in part it is because it puts general practice more within the control of the NHS.

Could things have been done differently?  Or did the overriding requirement for speed and rapid mobilisation mean the approach built around national control taken was the only realistic one available?

I think things could have been done differently.  The approach could have devolved more control to local areas.  Local areas could have been given a clear set of outcomes to achieve within a set timescale and a set amount of funding, and could have been allowed to develop and implement tailored solutions for their local areas.   Each area could have created its own, joined up mix of PCN, practice, and mass vaccination sites (or indeed other types of site), that could have worked together to ensure whole population coverage.

We are in a situation where PCN sites, mass vaccination sites and pharmacy sites feel more like they are competing against each other than working together to achieve whole population coverage.  Separate national implementation teams has led to local confusion rather than a joined up approach. If local areas had been able to design their own mix of service offerings everyone could have understood their respective roles and worked together as a local team.

Local areas could also have tailored their approach according to their own local strengths and weaknesses, and challenges.  Rural areas could have taken different approaches to more densely populated urban areas.  Mass vaccination sites could have been targeted where PCN sites found it more difficult to mobilise.  Most importantly, sites within local areas could have actively supported each other, as different members of the same team.

I know it is easy to criticise, and am cognisant of just how successful the vaccination programme has ultimately been so far.  But we are on the verge of a shift in NHS policy towards integrated care systems.  The danger is that these systems, and PCNs within them, simply become different units through which central NHS exercises top down control.

For integrated care and these new ICS systems to really work they need to be locally owned and led, and freed up from top down imposition.  The concern the national vaccination programme highlights is that local freedom and true integrated working will remain secondary to top down national control.  The cost of that approach is things that do not make sense at a local level as well as an unsustainable level of pressure on individuals.


Subscribe Today

Subscribe today to receive our weekly newsletter giving details of each episode of the General Practice Podcast as it is published plus our weekly blog and useful links for anyone interested in general practice innovation.  You’ll also receive a free copy of “Ten Steps for Establishing a Powerful Voice for General Practice”. Simply enter your email address and tick the box.

Did you enjoy this article?
Subscribe for Updates
Subscribe today to receive the General Practice blog every week. We’ll send you our weekly newsletter with details of innovation in General Practice, including this blog and our hugely popular podcast
Covid Pressures Latest developments
Ben Gowland

About Ben Gowland

Ben Gowland Ben is Director of Ockham Healthcare, and a former NHS CCG Chief Executive

No Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe Today

Subscribe today to receive our weekly newsletter giving details of each episode of the General Practice Podcast as it is published plus our weekly blog and useful links for anyone interested in general practice innovation. You’ll also receive a free copy of “Ten Steps for Establishing a Powerful Voice for General Practice”. Simply enter your email address and tick the box.

CONTACT INFO

Telephone: 07956 348654
E-mail: ben@ockham.healthcare

Recent Posts

  • Does Integration Really Mean Centralisation?
  • Podcast – Rachel Binks – Digital consultations for care homes
  • What does the new White Paper mean for General Practice?

Follow Us

Cookie Policy

website acceptable use policy

terms of website use

privacy Policy

Latest Tweets

How telehealth can support general practice in enhancing and improving health outcomes for care home patients...Rac… https://t.co/Be5Xi1YKC8

about 2 days ago

Our monthly joint #OckhamHealth and @PracticeIndex podcast is back and it's an inspirational one. @KayFKeane Nicola… https://t.co/ZoDafFmuCv

about 1 week ago
© Copyright 2016 - 2019 by Ockham Healthcare. All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our cookie policyAccept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.